GEG WP 2009/47 Developing Countries in the WTO Dispute Settlement System

Topics
FacebookTwitterLinked-in
New Publication: Economic Development and Political Violence in Ethiopia (GEG WP 145)
Palace of Westminster
Written evidence on trade governance for the APPG on Trade and Export Promotion
Sub- and non-state climate action: a framework to assess progress, implementation and impact

Full Title: Developing Countries in the WTO Dispute Settlement System

Author: Hunter Nottage

Type: GEG Working Paper 2009/47

Abstract

One of the most noteworthy achievements of the establishment of the WTO in 1995 was the introduction of its binding dispute settlement system. Building upon GATT dispute settlement practice, the Understanding on the Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes ('DSU') contains innovations that resulted in a paradigm shift from a system based on economic power and politics to one based on the rule of law. The resulting increased legality of the WTO has been hailed to benefit considerably smaller countries, of which many are developing countries and least-developed countries ('LDCs'). As Steger and Hainsworth comment, the shift 'is particularly beneficial for smaller countries, as without the rules and procedures of the DSU... they would not have the necessary bargaining power vis-à-vis the larger powers.'1 Similarly, Weiler notes the advantages of the legalised WTO model, 'especially for the meek economically and politically unequal.

Author Bio

Hunter Nottahe is the Lead Advisor International Economic Law at the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs & Trade.