Global Financial Regulation: Shortcomings and Reform Options

Published in Global Policy, February 2019
GEG WP 2019/141 Financial convergence in the financial periphery: How interdependence shapes regulators’ decisions
Sensitive intervention points in the post-carbon transition
The Brexit Negotiations: Hampered by the UK’s Weak Strategy

Standard‐setting bodies in global finance follow a core‐periphery logic, imposing a rigid dichotomy between standard‐setters and standard‐takers. They also focus exclusively on promoting financial stability. We argue that both attributes are increasingly problematic in today's world of globalised finance. Developing countries outside of standard‐setting bodies are highly integrated into global finance and while they are not systemically important, they are greatly affected by the regulatory decisions taken in the core. Analysing Basel banking standards, we show how the two‐tier structure of decision‐making results in international standards that generate adverse implications for countries in the periphery, particularly developing countries. Focusing on debates over the regulation of non‐bank credit intermediation, we show how the exclusive focus on financial stability can operate to the detriment of other important policy objectives, including financial inclusion. To improve the efficacy of international standard setting we make a series of recommendations aimed at increasing the applicability of standards to a wide variety of jurisdictions, and widening the focus of standard‐setting beyond financial stability. We also propose the creation of a new standard‐setting body for the regulation of fintech that models a more inclusive and holistic approach.


Policy implications

  • Strengthen the voice of developing countries in global financial standard‐setting by expanding and strengthening the institutional channels of consultation, and by fostering collaboration among developing country regulators.
  • Direct key standard‐setting bodies in financial regulation, and related international organisations, to conduct research on the impact of standards on developing countries at the standard design stage, not post hoc.
  • Amend the charter of global standard‐setting bodies to explicitly recognise the need for differentiated standards and commit to build proportionality into their design, so they can be readily adapted for use in a wide range of jurisdictions.
  • Create a new standard‐setting body for digital financial services with a dual mandate of harnessing both financial stability and financial inclusion.


Access the journal article here.